Your German sales lead can check the German. In ten minutes, not ten days.
You need someone who speaks Japanese to check the Japanese. You have someone, your Tokyo account manager, but you cannot hand a colleague 800 rows of spreadsheet and call it a review.
Professional review is slow and expensive; internal review is unstructured and quietly ignored. Both are done blind, because neither reviewer can see where the words land on screen, and neither has any way to say which lines they have already looked at.
How TextSetu handles it
A draft needs a person who actually speaks the language.
- 01
Reviewed in context, not in a row
In-context screenshots attach to each line, so a reviewer sees the button, not the row.
- 02
One queue, accept or reject
One queue with accept and reject, so reviewing is a sequence of decisions rather than a document.
- 03
Scored first, so attention goes where it counts
A second AI scores the drafts first, so the person only scrutinises what looks questionable.
- 04
Scoped to one language
Permissions let a colleague review one language without touching anything else in the project.
- 05
Every decision on the record
Every decision is recorded with a name and a timestamp, so review is auditable rather than assumed.
Every market gets a real reviewer, at no extra cost, in minutes rather than weeks.
Every market gets a real reviewer, at no extra cost, in minutes rather than weeks.